Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:01:36 -0500
Subject: Re: [GHHF] Ayodhya verdict is similar to – "you grab it, we legitimize it" Meeting to discuss the Verdict on Saturday (October 2) at 4:00 pm in Dallas and 5 other cities
From: dharmarakshana@savetemples.org
To: tholiya@hotmail.com
Thanks. Very good observation. Yes we need to have a fitting Temple for Lord Rama. Thanks (V. V. Prakasa Rao)
Muslims have mecca. Others have Rome. But such huge population and vast country does not have their own Ayodhya? Secularism has become farce. No court can be allowed to interfer in faith of 100 crore Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Budhists in India and abroad.
Thanks and Regards, Alok Tholiya (S.E.O.), M:9324225699 : ONLY AUTHENTIC FREE MATRIMONIALS WEBSITE FOR DIGAMBAR JAINS: www.digambarjains.com/For Issues of Sr. citizens : http://varishthanagrik.blogspot.com/ Issues of Public interests : http://aloktholiya.blogspot.com/ http://tenantsoftholiyabhavn.blogspot.com/ For harrassed litigansts : http://litigants.ning.com/ For education funds : http://ngoandsociety.spaces.live.com/default.aspx •Also subscribe to my very popular yahoo group for mails on ahead of time views: Send blank mail to: menow-subscribe@yahoogroups.com precious collections: http://beautifulwe.blogspot.com/
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:15:47 -0500Subject: [GHHF] Ayodhya verdict is similar to – "you grab it, we legitimize it" Meeting to discuss the Verdict on Saturday (October 2) at 4:00 pm in Dallas and 5 other cities
From: dharmarakshana@gmail.com
To: globalhinduheritagefoundation@gmail.com
[GHHF] Ayodhya verdict is similar to – "you grab it, we legitimize it" Meeting to discuss the Verdict on Saturday (October 2) at 4:00 pm in Dallas and 5 other cities
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." Edmund Burke
Three Judge bench of Allahabad court of Lucknow Bench in a majority decision ruled on Thursday that Ram was born at the spot and that his idol should remain there. The verdict states unequivocally that the disputed site is the birthplace of Ram. The court's observation that the "disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Muslims." In its judgment court says that it was built over a destroyed temple.
Justice S U Khan said let the land be divided in three parts, one each for the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party representing Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha – the party for Lord Ram. Khan said the area where Ram's idol is should be given to Hindus. Muslims to be given a separate portion of the courtyard, and third litigant Nirmohi Akhara another section of the courtyard.
The Courts itself contracted itself in making the judgment. It agreed that the "disputed site" was the birthplace of Lord Rama. If that is the case, how can the Court say that they divide the land into three parts and distribute it to three groups?
It is a sketchy, patchy, fearful, instigated, illegal, arbitrary, political, and appeasement judgment. It has crossed it's legal boundaries of jurisdiction.
First of all the judgment is surprising and astonishing because of the fact that none the plaintiffs has asked for the division of the land into three parts. Court clearly went beyond it's jurisdiction. The decision is more of political nature to appease the Muslims than a legal, rational, logical decision. This unprecedented ruling is going to pave the way for others to ask for legitimacy of occupying all the Hindu Temples that were converted into masjids. This decision has more implications for the usurpation of Hindu Lands and Hindu Temples. It should be challenged on the ground that no plaintiff has asked for the division and also that the court went beyond it's legal nature of the case. It should not take a political decision on the issues.
What the Allahabad High Court said is that "you grab Hindu lands and demolish Hindu Temple, we will legitimize it." The court said we will follow the government policy of "you grab it, we regularize it." Can any body find the difference between the Court's judgment and political appeasement?
Please join the discussion group to express your views on the verdict – whether it is favorable to Hindus or not on this Saturday.
Global Hindu Heritage Foundation is organizing meetings to discuss about the implications of this verdict in the following cities in USA:
1) Dallas, Texas
Meeting Details:
Date: October 2, 2010 (Saturday)
Time 4:00 pm
Place: L.E.R. Schimelpfenig Library
5024 Custer Road, Plano TX 75023
972.769.4200
TV9 is expected to cover the discussion.
2) Chicago, Illinois
Contact: Prasad Yalamachi for the time and date
630-418-1122
3) New Jersey
Contact: Satya for details
4) Atlanta, Georgia
Contact: Pavan for further details
312-675-2758
5) Orlando, Florida
Contact: Bharat at 407-970-5511
6) Raleigh, North Carolina
Contact: Raju at 919-303-0247
ENCOURAGE:
Please encourage all your friends to attend these meetings closer to their place
Allahabad Court Judgment
The essence of the judgment is to divide the Rama Janmabhumi to be divide into three portions as follows:
1) Central Portion of Temple Area where murties are installed - Rama Lalla
2) Platform and Kitchen Area - Nirmohi Akhara
3) Area where both both Hindus and Moslems had been worshipping together for many decades – Muslims.
Link to the Judgment
You can visit the website to get more detailed information:
http://rjbm.nic.in/
Attachmnents
You can also look at the four documents – all from the court. Please read and digest.
DonationsWe need your assistance to continue our mission of abolishing Endowment Act and free Temples from the government control. If we have to make an impact on our movement to bring changes to preserve our culture, we need you financial support. Your generous donations to continue our efforts to free Hindu Temples from government control, awaken the Hindus about the plight of Hindu Temples and the impending danger of illegal conversion techniques are essential. We are requesting all the individuals and organizations to support financially to continue our movement to free Hindu Temples from the government control and stop these conversions.
NOTE: GHHF is exempt from federal income tax under section 501 ( c ) 3 of the Internal Revenue code.
Our tax ID # 41-2258630
Please send your tax-deductible donations to:
Global Hindu Heritage Foundation,
14726 Harmony Lane, Frisco, Texas 75035
You can go to savetemples.org and pay by PAYPAL
For more information
Please visit our website: http://savetemples.org
V. V. Prakasa Rao, PhD, 601-918-7111 (cell), 601-856-4783 (home); Prasad Yalamanchi (630-832-2665; 630-359-5041), D. Satya 732-939-2060: Vinay 248-842-6964: Srinivas Murthy 212-538-8716: Dr. K. R. Venkatramaiah (Canada) 416-925-8167. Nemana Satya 732-762-7104, Sekhar Reddy 954-895-1947, Tulasichand Tummala 408-786-8357, Raju Polavaram 919-959-6141; Pavan Neti 630-338-9364
No comments:
Post a Comment